Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Palm and Passion Sunday: Part 2

Passion Readings:Isaiah 50:4-9aLuke 22:14-23:56

We now consider some of the readings for the Passion.

Prayer: Life-giver, Pain-bearer, Love-maker,day by day you sustain the weary with your word and gently encourage us to place our trust in you.

Awaken us to the suffering of those around us;save us from hiding in denials or taunts that deepen the hurt;give us grace to share one an other's burdens in humble service. Amen.



Isaiah 50:4-9

  • "The tongue of a teacher, that I may know how to sustain the weary with a word." Sustaining the weary with a word. That's a gift; that's power. Who can accomplish this feat? Isaiah, apparently! Isn't this part of what we do in the Christian community, speaking the Word on Sunday, in readings, in sermon. With God's Word, we can sustain the weary. Have you ever been sustained by a word, a kind word , a hopeful word...?
  • "I gave my back . . . and my cheeks . . . I did not hide the face." Let us not think that there is nothing of Jesus' 'turn the other cheek' teaching in the Old Testament, that the OT only speaks of 'an eye for an eye' - this passage show us its just not so.
  • "I have set my face like flint." Jesus is said to have set his face like flint as he walks towards Jerusalem. Can you think of a time when you have done this, been determined, steadfast, resolute as you take on a challenge

Luke 22:14-23:56


I guess you have to ask: why is this huge, all encompassing text read on Palm Sunday when much of this material will be included later in Holy Week? The answer, on the practical side, is that is many in our congregations won't be back again until Easter Sunday - won't be at Maundy Thursday or Good Friday. They need to know how we get from Palm Sunday to Easter Morning. Imagine a Christianity that went from Palm celebrations to easter celebrations. What would be lost if we just skipped the betrayal and passion and cross?

And also, there is something profound in the contrast of starting a service with the joy of the Palms and then ending with the reality of the cross.


This text as a whole is almost too huge to comment on. It is to be read. reflected on. heard. Felt. Experienced. Try watching a movie version of this Biblical scene. I am partial to the the film: The Gospel of John - an excellent word for word film rendition of the gospel story.

"But all his acquaintances . . . stood at a distance, watching these things." I wonder what was going on in their minds as they watched. Horror? Shock? Helplessness? Overwhelmed? Giving up? Where would you be in that crowd? What would you be feeling?

From "Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord" to "Crucify, crucify him." ...this speaks to the reality of who Jesus was and is, and particularly the reality of our struggle as humans to respond to him and his call to us.

Readings for Palm and Passion Sunday



Palm Readings : Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29Luke 19:28-40


Passion Readings:Isaiah 50:4-9aPsalm 31:9-16Philippians 2:5-11Luke 22:14-23:56 or Luke 23:1-49


Prayer for Holy Week
Compassionate God,your love finds full expression in the gift of Jesus Christ your Son,who willingly met betrayal and death to set us free.Give us courage to live faithfully in these days until we greet the glory of our risen Savior. Amen.






This Sunday marks the beginning of Holy Week. It begins with the triumphant entry of Jesus into Jerusalem. Let us look at the Palm Sunday readings first.



















Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29
This is a Psalm of joy, of celebration and of thanksgiving. It is a song of entrance. Originally the psalm marks the entrance of someone, a king or a worshipper, as they enter the holy Temple in Jerusalem .


This Psalm presents a dialogue between someone who is on the inside and one who is entering. There is a reminder to the one coming in that all who enter need be righteous. This reflects the priestly understanding that all who approach the altar of God need to be pure.



Bind the festal procession with branches...These words reflect a liturgical rite. Branches are brought to the altar. In the feast of tabernacles, olive branches were used in worship


The stone that the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone.This is the Lord's doing; it is marvelous in our eyes. These verses are frequently quoted in the New Testament, e.g. Matthew 21:42; Acts 4:11; 1 Corinthians 3:11; Ephesians 2:20; 1 Peter 2:7-8. They were very important for the early Church in their attempt to understand the rejection and execution of Jesus by his people.



Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the LORD. We bless you from the house of the LORD. This is a priestly blessing extended to those who are entering...



This Psalm with it branches and it s celebration of the entrance of one who is righteous, reflects the mood of Palm Sunday; Jesus enters Jerusalem and is greeted with palm branches strewn on his way.


Reflections:

  • "The stone that the builders reject has become the chief cornerstone." Such a powerful verse, used to describe Christ by the prophets. But good for us too: when others reject us, God accepts us. In God, we can become the cornerstone, not a rejected scrap. Hope!

  • "This is the Lord's doing." Giving credit where credit is due. We're not so good at that many times. What do we need to remember is "the Lord's doing."

  • "This is the day that the Lord has made." This is such a popular opening to worship. Why do we like this verse so much? It does a good job of reminding us of the fact that each day is God's precious gift to us.

  • “Come on in and disturb our perfect lives. You are the Christ for us today.” These words are from Benedictine Joan Chichester; they reflect the welcome that is to be extended to anyone who comes to our gate, our doorway. The righteous are welcomed. The rejected too. As Christ enters Jerusalem, so many come through our church doors. How do we welcome them?


Luke 19:28-40



The triumphant palm procession, reenacted around the world on Palm Sunday.

Jesus intended a demonstration as he approached Jerusalem.Luke draws this out for the readers in echoing Zecheriah 9 9-10 and in his redaction of Psalm 118.26. This is the blessing pronounced on pilgrims coming up to the temple for a festival now changed to King or Lord to highlight the belief that we are to presume the disciples believe themselves to be taking part in a coronation procession for a Messiah – the donkey stressing the non- military – the passive authority that will establish the universal kingdom of peace.

  • "Go into the village ahead of you, and as you enter it you will find tied there . . . " Not necessarily Jesus prophesying, as some have interpreted. Just Jesus telling them of the plans he has made ahead of time. We never seem satisfied with things just happening in the realm of the natural - we always seem to want to add a supernatural element to scripture, as if it is not powerful enough ...

  • "began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power they had seen" I wonder why it is we praise God ? So why praise God? Because God is God!? Because God does things for us? Because we want to stay on God's good side?"

  • saying, 'peace on earth'" Ironic that they would say these words what they really wanted was for Jesus to become a revolutionary leader, sword in hand. Peace for whom?
There is a dark backdrop to the celebrations of Palm Sunday. The readings for passion Sunday will be considered in the next post.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Lent 4 - readings for March 14, 2010



What emotion do you perceive in the father's eyes?

Take a moment as you centre yourself in prayer:

O God of outstretched arms, you welcome us to times of deeper reflection – that we might find once again our wholeness and our peace in you. Expand our hearts, O God, breathe into our thinking, that we might find in your word, the courage to shape the world around us. Amen

READ Luke 15:1-3

Today’s gospel reading is the last parable in a series of 3 (including the lost sheep, lost coin) which portray God as seeking the lost. These first three verses give us the background of Jesus’ explanation – they contrast his understanding of “right relationship” according to certain “Pharisees and scribes.”

This is not an attack on all Jews – Amy Jill Levine writes that when Christians hear Pharisee, we think “evil, self-righteous, hypocrites” – that is Luke’s influence, not Jesus’. Luke rejected the Pharisees because they refused to follow Paul to Jesus.
- Jesus accepted their invitations to supper; and they warned him about Herod; so there was a certain collegiality between them.
- Jesus might have recognized they were good, holy people, and certainly did not condemn them personally, only an attitude of self-righteousness (in general)
- Amy Jill Levine even suggests that their over-abundance of faith overflowed and might even have helped the “sinners” that Luke shows them putting down.

Question for reflection:
Who would be our contemporary sinners and our contemporary Pharisees?

READ Luke 15:11b-24

What is the name usually given this parable? Prodigal Son. Yet the word prodigal means spending freely, even wastefully. So it could as well be called the parable of the Prodigal Father, who pours out his love in an abundant, wasteful way, like God.

Verse 11b: “There was a man who had two sons…” Think of similar stories of two brothers from Hebrew scripture and you will find family conflict: Cain and Abel, Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob – first century Jewish ears were primed for conflict to follow.

v. 12 – Inheritance was usually divided in 3 for 2 sons: 1 third of the estate for each son, the third part going to elder son as birthright after his father’s death. When the younger son leaves, and demands his inheritance liquidated, it is as if he is saying his father is dead to him. “Gimme” is the attitude we are supposed to grow out of, and yet “inheritance” can be interpreted as a sign of how much we are worth to that person. He demands proof that his father loves him.

v.13 – selling ancestral lands was shocking behavior, disrespectful to family and God.

v.14 Famine is a reversal of the usual formula, where Israel went looking for food in other nations. It would shock the audience and send the message this is not your usual parable.

v.15 A swine-keeper was not only lowly, but unclean in Jewish law.

v. 17 “But when he came to himself…” The words suggest he began to see himself as he really was, in the wrong place, but not completely worthless – he could still work in his father’s household, if not return as a son.

Question for Reflection:
Have you ever had one of those moments, where you “came to yourself?”

v.18 “I will go and say to my father…” he has his strategy worked out, knows his place. “I have sinned against heaven and you.” His wrongdoing not just personal but cosmic.

v.20 – Father runs, loses all decorum, makes plans to celebrate, honour him as a son, not hire him as a worker.

v. 23 A fatted calf was usually kept for a family celebration like a wedding. Was it the elder son’s wedding?

READ Luke 15:25-31

The elder son asks the question we are all wondering: What did my brother ever do to deserve this?

Father’s perspective: If we are to forgive, we are to forgive utterly and completely.

A story about giving love and being able to receive it in the right spirit – not because we deserve it, or it is our right.

Lenten season – prepares us for the story of Easter and the miracle of moving from death to new life; loss to reconciliation.

Question for Reflection: Who do you relate to? Why?

READ Joshua 5:9-12

An unusual passage without much context, chosen because it is a homecoming.

Preparations to take promised land: (1) affirm new leader, Joshua; (2) spies make alliance with Rahab; (3) ark of the covenant leads parade into promised land; (4) 12 stones set up as holy markers for 12 tribes; (5) all males circumcized

v.9 Gilgal means “rolled away” usually referring to circle of stones with holy significance. Play on words, YHWH “rolls away” the disgrace of Egypt.

v.10-12 The Israelites celebrate passover, old tradition. They also begin to rely on the food of the land, instead of manna from heaven, but it doesn’t change in significance, it is still God who is feeding them, new tradition. They are celebrating the familiar and unfamiliar at the same time.

Question for Reflection:
Rites of passage, like baptism, marriage, funerals, are constantly changing, and yet contain some elements that never change. How do you feel about them being changed, or never changing?

READ 2 Corinthians 5:16-21

The great debate: “human point of view” vs. “God’s perspective”.
Not world, flesh vs psyche, soul, heaven – too simplistic. Instead it is, “humanity in the world, without God” vs “humanity in the world, with God”.

v.17 Relationship with Jesus is life-altering, changes our point of view.
We are invited to become truly who we are meant to be.

v.18 The death of Christ is holy, not tragic, because it teaches us about unconditional love, forgiving whole-heartedly, being reconciled.

Closing Reflection:

Psalm 32:1-7 by James Taylor Everyday Psalms, (Wood Lake Books, 1994) which he introduces this way:
A friend, a Roman Catholic, once said: You Protestants have no idea how good it feels to be able to confess something and get it off your chest!

Happy are those who have nothing to hide;
Even happier those whose slate has been wiped clean.
I used to lie awake, worrying about things I had done;
And during the day, about things I had not cdone.
My conscience tormented me, I couldn’t concentrate.
I was terrified of being exposed.
So I went to God and confessed.
I made no excuses for myself; I didn’t hide anything.
And God forgave me.

What a relief it is to share a gnawing secret!
Forgiveness is like a cool drink on a hot day,
Like a warm fire in a winter blizzard.
God’s grace renews my strength; it gives me a second chance.

Lent 3 - readings for March 7 2010


Take a moment to centre yourself in prayer, focussing on the "fruitfulness" of our faith journeys:

O God of open table, of open door, we are thankful that we are invited into your embrace. For you give food that nourishes us in body and in spirit. You offer us the Living Water of Jesus. You open to us a whole household of grace. You fill us with Spirit and hope. May your Word, your grace and your Spirit enter into our reading and reflection today, for we pray in Jesus’ name, Amen.

READ Isaiah 55:1-9

There are 3 eras covered by Isaiah’s prophecies – pre-exile (Leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BCE), exile (in Babylon and Persian empires), post-exile (after Cyrus gave permission to return to Jerusalem, 400 BCE)

This passage comes from the end of the exile period, looking forward to or already living in the return to their promised land. There is some scholarly dispute about whether it is exile or post-exile for this passage, but clearly it is in that time of transition, where the people are facing a journey into the unknown.

NOTES:
v.1 – The passage begins with “Ho!” – the only place in the Bible that informal greeting or call is used – it is the biblical equivalent of “Hey you! Get a load of this!” Used to get people’s attention in a busy and competitive market place.

The prophecy alone should get people’s attention – you can eat and drink without cost!
These are a people without land, resources, possibly after long journey, feeling uprooted.
God gives them the best deal.

It sends the message that God recognizes the real needs of the people, but also looks to fill a hunger beyond the belly.

Question for Reflection: What things do you “hunger” for? Do you think God knows about that hunger? What do you think God plans to do about it? What does God want you to do about your own hunger?

Isaiah 55 contrasts the early chapters (9:2) where the people wasted resources on things that do not satisfy.

v.3 – If one wants to be filled it is imperative to come, listen, incline your ear.
v.3-4 – This is the only mention of David in all of 2nd or 3rd Isaiah (Chapters 40-60) – because for Isaiah the focus of covenant is God’s people, not the king. He was a strong critic of human kings.
v. 5 – “You shall call nations … and nations shall come to you…” But it is YHWH who glorifies the people of God, not by their own actions.

v.6 – To contact YHWH you must act justly, or repent. Evil deeds get in the way.
v.7 – Those who have been unfaithful are encouraged to repent, so “the return” is imagined on 2 levels – both returning to right relationship with God, and returning to the promised land.

v.8-9 – Yet God is beyond our understanding, a warning that we cannot manipulate God with our actions.

READ Luke 13:1-9

What is a Parable? A short story that teaches a lesson – not meant to be taken as historical, but metaphorical.

But it is prefaced by a real historical situation – where Galileans were martyred, probably for rebellion, and their blood was mixed with animal blood at the sacrifice. There was a very public denouncement by Pilate of Jewish sensibilities – and a warning to the Jewish leaders to get their people under control. It is an indication of the politically charged climate of the time. There is also reference to an accident at Siloam, and whether the victims were being punished by God for sinning.

Jesus teaching is contrary to traditional “wisdom” literature – what befalls us is accident, not punishment. His point is to demonstrate why we should always be ready to meet our maker. There is urgency in Jesus’ message, asking what could be more important?

Parable of fruitless fig tree – valuable land, water, resources
Draws on previous understandings of fig trees
Micah 7:1 – signifies peace, security a time to rest
Isaiah 5:1-7 – a beloved vineyard destroyed

But Jesus shows how God gives another chance, demonstrates extravagant love.
True faith must have purpose, not just for the comfort of the believer.

Question for Reflection: Do you feel you are bearing fruit, or just taking up space? As a congregation, are we bearing fruit?

READ 1 Corinthians 10:1-13

Paul reinterpreting Moses’ people in the wilderness – takes for granted knowledge of Exodus.
Yet his point was about the followers of Jesus – how they needed to be faithful and not just part of a particular group.
Ch 9 has been about idol worship, this chapter points out how the people of God, whether in the wilderness or Corinth, all need to be faithful to ONE God.

Closing Prayer:

O God, in your stories we read of your mercy and reconciling Spirit. Be gracious to us, O God, as we seek to understand the choices you would have us make. Give us hearts full of compassion and steadfast faith to embrace and hold fast to the truth of your word. We pray in Jesus’ name, the one who with you and Holy Spirit lives forever and ever, Amen

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Readings For Lent 2, 2010 February 2010




Texts for Second Sunday in Lent, February 28, 2010 Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18 * Psalm 27 * Philippians 3:17-4:1 * Luke 13:31-35

Prayer:

Jesus Christ:like a mother hen,you gather up our doubts and transform them into confidence;you surround our fearsand transform them into faithfulness;you pick up our brokenness and make us strong together.
Gather us together into your warm and inviting presence and hear us as we pray as Jesus teaches,Our Father . . .








Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18



Background: God has called on Abram to leave Ur (now in Iraq) and to “Go ... to the land I will show you” . God has blessed him, and he, his wife Sarah and his brother Lot have migrated to Canaan. Famine has struck the land, causing Abram and his family to seek food in Egypt. Pharaoh has been attracted to Sarah, thinking that she is Abram’s sister, taking her into the royal household. When he has discovered that she is Abram’s wife, he has ordered them to leave the country.



Our reading is two stories of gifts from God:
· a son and many descendants;
· the Land.



The formula “the word of the LORD came to ...” read in verse 1 and 4 is later used of prophets; so the text suggests that Abram is a prophet. God makes Abram his favorite; he will protect (“shield”), him. Abram’s “reward” is really a free gift. Custom was that if a man’s wife did not bear him a son, his chief servant (“Eliezer”) might inherit. God promises Abram a son (“your very own issue") and he will have countless descendants (“stars” ). Abram puts his trust in God’s promise; in this way, he establishes a right relationship.



From Jeremiah we know that the ceremony in verses 9, 10 and 17 are of ancient origin. Going between the two halves of sacrificial victims signified that if a party broke the agreement, he could expect to be dismembered (!). Abram has a vision : the descent of the sun, “deep sleep”, terror and great “darkness” express the awesomeness of supernatural intervention. God’s presence is symbolized by fire .Only he has obligations under the pact, so only he passes between the “pieces”. The deal is cut : David’s empire later stretched almost from the Nile to near the upper reaches of the “Euphrates” (verse 18)



Reflection:

  • "Do not be afraid, Abram." How many times does the phrase "do not be afraid" occur in the Bible? In a recent radio interview Rabbi Harold Kushner said that the phrase uttered by god more often than any other in the hebrew Scriptures is; "Do not be afraid". God is always telling us not to be afraid. Why is that? What does God suspect, know, that we are so afraid of anyway? Are we afraid of God? Afraid of being alone? Afraid of finding out that our lives don't have meaning, or that they do? Whatever it is, God promises to be there in it with us, and to calm our fears.
  • In this passage, God promises Abram that it will not be a slave, but a child of Abram's own that will carry on Abram's line, one of his descendents which will be as numerous as the stars, and that they will live in the land that God is promising them. I think about what it means to "carry on the family name", what we understand and feel about childbearing and barrenness today, etc. Why is it so important to have a child to carry on a family's line? WHat do we fear will happen if wee cannot havbe a child?
  • What does it mean to place so much importance on carrying on of a family line? I'm sure its one of the few ways we humans can convince ourselves that we will at least in that measure have some sense of immortality - someone with our own blood will live on. But where are the stories in the Bible where the family is never blessed with the child? Where there is no Isaac, or Samuel, or John the Baptist that lifts the parents out of despair? Where is the good news for those who cannot bear a child?
  • The promise to Abraham is made against competing claims. The land of promise is valued by others too. The land of this covenant is still fought over today.
  • What do we do to secure a covenant? We no longer walk between halved animals. What do we do to seal a promise?


Philippians 3:17-4:1

Philippians 3:17-4:1
Background: Paul wrote to the church at Philippi, a prosperous Roman colony in northern Greece, from prison. We do not know whether this imprisonment was in Ephesus or in Rome. It appears that he was held under house arrest. It is possible that the epistle is actually made up of three letters. It contains many personal references, exhorts members of the Philippian church to live the Christian life and to good ethical conduct, introduces Timothy and Epaphroditus as his representatives, and warns against legalists and libertines. Lastly, he thanks the Philippian community for their material support.



Paul has written in Chapter 3, verse 10: “I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the sharing of his sufferings by becoming like him in his death” . He states that he has not yet fully understood Christ, but he presses on towards the goal of being with Christ when he comes again. This is how “mature” Christians should think: they have not yet achieved full understanding.


Now Paul offers himself as an example of centering oneself in Christ, in his sufferings. (At the time, Paul was in prison.) Observe those who follow his (our) example! He warns against “many”who centre on other things. Who are they? Perhaps self-centred people, but more likely Christians who insist on keeping Jewish dietary laws and on circumcision: to boast in this is to glory in an organ which should be modestly covered .These are “earthly things”, made obsolete by Christ’s coming. Society looks to Rome for citizenship but we look to “heaven” .Our bodies, now mortal, will enter eternal life in a changed form, to achieve union with Christ . As in Psalm 8, the Messiah will be sovereign over all (“subject to himself”); Christ is the Messiah and so, Paul exhorts, do not deviate from the true faith!



Reflection:

  • Paul speaks about our human physical bodies and our spiritual, transformed bodies, with our 'citizenship in heaven.' What is liberatring about the idea of having our bodies transformed at the end of things? What is alienating about this idea?
  • In Christian history people have sometimes ignored the physical in lifting up the spiritual. Do we sometimes forget that ours is an incarnational faith; the Word became flesh and not the other way around?
  • Do we not have to be careful not to enter into a heaven/hell, spirit/body dichotomy that may lead us to prematurely abandon this world as we anticiapte the next? We're part of God's good creation, which includes this world in all its imperfections. We are to seek to 'transform' this world with God's grace.



Luke 13:31-35

Someone had asked earlier: “Will only a few be saved?” .Jesus has warned that few who have eaten with him will enter the Kingdom; many apparently pious people will be excluded. Many others, from across the world, will eat with him.

Now “some Pharisees” , in perhaps the only favourable mention of them in the gospels, advise him to leave Herod Antipas’ territory (“here”, i.e. Galilee and Perea). (Herod the Great died soon after Jesus was born.) To Jesus, Herod is “that fox” : destructive, tricky, sly, politically motivated. Herod will not cut short Jesus’ earthly ministry. His journey to Jerusalem “must”, in accord with the Father’s will, continue day-by-day; in and at his resurrection (“third day”) he will complete, consummate, his mission of restoring mankind to the relationship God intended at creation.

Jerusalem, not Herod, has first claim on God’s messengers! .This city is to be the place of, and the agent of, his murder. Jesus laments over the city and (probably) its religious leaders (“house”). The city’s residents, rejecting him now, will not see him again until they shout “Blessed ...” as he rides triumphantly into the city on the first Palm Sunday.


  • "How often I have desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!" What a verse! What emotion! Some potent feminine imagery too.
  • Hear Jesus' extreme sorrow that he can't make us understand his message
  • Jesus wants to protect and save
  • Note the imagery of a hen. We user animal images to describe countries: the American eagle, the Canadian beaver... We use them to decribe people: Herod is a fox...Can you think of zoological images found in scripture, used to speak of God...The Lion of Judah...the mother Eagle of Isaiah carrying her young to safety...
  • In tradition too we find more images from Creation used to speak of God, like the wild goose of the Celts, which was a symbol of the Holy Spirit...
  • What kind of animal are you?
  • What image do you like to use when you think of God...?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Readings for Lent 1C, February 21, 2010


Take a moment to centre your heart and thoughts on the image of a journey:
a rocky path...
a steep climb...
a positive or negative destination...
a companion by your side...


Prayer:
Journey with us, O God, through this day, through this season. When we find ourselves in a wilderness of questions or doubts, you are there to walk with us. When we find ourselves self-righteous and full of knowledge, you are there to unsettle us. When we feel ourselves alone and isolated, you are there to offer strength and peace. Ever our companion, ever our compassion, we pray to you in Jesus’ name, Amen.

Lent: The word comes from the old English “lencten” which refers to the lengthening days of spring. Most church seasons are not tied to a physical season, but this one really fits for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, where we long for more light and see the promise fulfilled, day by day, in the unfolding of our spring.

The colour of Lent is purple, symbolizing repentence and royalty.
For Mardi Gras, the colour purple symbolizes justice!

Lenten symbolism includes wilderness or desert imagery, ie. rocks, footprints, sand. In many churches no flowers are found in the sanctuary during Lent, and anything ornamented is draped with simple cloths. In Lent, we also use some of the Passion story imagery: tenebrae candles are snuffed out a week at a time, to symbolize the growing shadows as we grow closer to the cross, a rope or bag of coins, the crown of thorns.

Shrove (or Pancake)Tuesday tradition comes from using up butter and eggs before the time of restraint, also Mardi Gras or Carnaval (Quebec).

Traditionally, the restraint of Lent was not observed on Sundays – its 40 days are based on a 6 day week, Monday to Saturday. Every Sunday is considered a little Easter.

The gospel readings on Lent 1 tell the story of Jesus’ temptation:

READ Luke 4:1-13

What Luke is emphasizing in particular, compared to the other synoptic gospels –
Jesus is “full of the Spirit” – the Spirit is within, not external. We see this in both the beginning (v1) and the end (v14) of the passage.

Luke reverses the order found in Matthew of the 2 last temptations, so that the final temptation will take place in Jerusalem, and Jesus will “choose” to return to Galilee to begin his ministry.

For Luke this is the final stage of Jesus’ preparation for ministry: he had an “ordinary human” childhood and early adulthood – he was proclaimed by John the Baptist – he was baptized and heard God’s voice– and Luke affirms his heritage through his version of the begats – then Jesus is tested for readiness in the temptation story.


He began in the wilderness – like Moses (who represents the law) and Elijah (who represents the prophets) this is where Jesus’ active ministry begins, as the fulfillment of the law and the prophets.

Luke uses the greek word peirasmos meaning “testing” more than “tempting” – a more neutral word, less laden with judgements about right and wrong. Can he be lured into a more comfortable vision of messiah-hood? Will he choose to do what is good for him but not God?

Satan’s Challenge: “if you really are the son of God…”
Jesus demonstrates that his identity does not have to be proven, it can only be believed.

Question for reflection: Are there times when people ask us to “prove” our faith? Do we fall into that temptation to prove ourselves right?

Who is Satan?

Mark uses the legal term the satan, tou satana, which in secular terms means an adversary or prosecutor. Satan is not a personal first-name, but a descriptive noun.
Matthew and Luke use diabolos, which literally means “to tear apart” (ie. the force that makes our choices absolutely clear – you cannot have both, you have to give something up.)

A similar name is found in the Hebrew book of Job, where “ha-Satan”(in Hebrew meaning the accuser) is actually an angel, one whose role is to point out to God all the contradictions and weaknesses of human nature.

First temptation: Feed yourself!
Jesus’response: Bread is good but I did not come to fill people’s physical hunger…

Second temptation: Rule the world better than Caesar IF you will worship me, not God.
Jesus response: There is only one God.

Third temptation: (in the Jerusalem temple – why?) Make God prove LOVE
Jesus response: I don’t need to.

In the end, Jesus did feed the hungry, he does “reign” from God’s kingdom, he did trust that God would redeem him from death – but he would not let the tempter be the one to set the timeline.

Question for reflection: All three temptations are about trusting God to fulfil a promise. Do we trust God and work with God, or do we try to do things on our own, because we’ve given up on God actually having power in our lives?

READ Deuteronomy 26:1-11

This passage is set in the time when the Israelites are ready to come out of the wilderness, after wandering there for forty years. They are being instructed the appropriate attitude to take towards the promised land – to understand to whom their loyalty belongs and how to show their thanks.

Verses 5-9 contain a re-telling of their history, set in the kind of poetic language that it indicates a creedal statement shared in the community over many years. In this passage the creedal statement is paired with two sets of instructions for offering first-fruits, one before and one after the creedal affirmation – ie. “if you believe this, then you should do this!”

The passage continues (v 12ff) to describe the offering of the tithe, every three years, giving a tenth of one’s income/produce to support the religious personnel (Levites), the poor, the widows, the aliens. This chapter is actually the conclusion of a very long section of the Law on worship (chs 12-26).

Question for Reflection: The Israelites believed that God rescued them from oppression in Egypt because God had compassion for their suffering. THEREFORE the only suitable thanksgiving was one that would offer compassion to those who were suffering in their midst. Do you/we have the same kind of understanding for our offerings or charitable givings?

READ Psalm 91

I know my impression of this psalm is coloured by the beautiful hymn: “On Eagles’ wings”, which paraphrases much of the psalm in its verses. The chorus, however, is based on Isaiah 40, which has the eagles’ wings and hollow of God’s hand imagery.

Don’t be disappointed! There is still lots of interesting imagery to explore in the psalm. It also mentions God’s wings (v.4) and pinion feathers.

The main theme is safety – possibly sung on entering the temple as an expression of thanks for getting there safely, or on leaving the temple, expressing the hope to make the journey home the same way. It is also an expression of trust in God that runs much deeper – throughout all of life’s journey, not just our comings and goings from worship.

The first 13 verses are directed by a leader to the worshipper/s; the last verses by God to the people God loves. The psalm contains elements of wisdom theology – where those who are faithful to God prosper in life and those who are evil are punished in life (v.9-10.)

Question for Reflection: The use of God’s voice in the final verses poses an interesting question: Do we trust God first, then because of our trust, God protects us? Or does God protect us or offer us compassion in times of suffering, and then we learn to trust God?

READ Romans 10:8-13

Marcus Borg suggests in The Heart of Christianity (Harper Books, 2003) that there are different ways to understand the word “believe”. Given Western post-Enlightenment attitudes to science as the basis of truth, we are inclined to hear the word “believe” and think of something that has been proven to be true to our intellect. We give intellectual assent to a statement because we are convinced it is correct or true – ie. I believe that… However, Borg points out that it can also mean I believe in…, which is a statement of trust or relationship.

When Paul says: “if you confess with your lips/if you believe with your heart” it sounds more like the relational, trusting definition of believing in Jesus, rather than the one that finds its truth in intellectual proof.

It defies logic to suggest that salvation should be based entirely on faith – what about all those good works? What about paying the tithe, observing the Sabbath, maintaining celibacy? Paul suggests to the Christians of Jewish and non-Jewish origins who were living in Rome that what unifies them is not what they do, but the one thing they really have in common – a deep and loving relationship with God through Jesus Christ.

Question for Reflection: Have you ever worshipped with a different faith community or cultural group, where the practice of faith seemed very distinct from your own? Were you able to find an underlying unity in spite of the many external differences?

Closing Prayer:
O God, eternal presence, we never journey alone. Even in the wilderness, the place made sacred by Jesus’ faithful choices, we know that you will be with us. In the silence we encounter your Spirit deep within. In the clamour we absorb your energy and diversity. In voices of suffering we hear your call to serve. Guide our Lenten steps in love, O God, as we change our lives and lift our hearts to you, Amen

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Texts for Transfiguration Sunday, February 14, 2010
Exodus 34:29-35 * Psalm 99 * 2 Corinthians 3:12-4:2 * Luke 9:28-36, (37-43)








Prayer:

O God, as your Child Jesus drew apart
to be in prayer with you,
help us to be apart for a time with you.
W offer our prayers
for the transformation of the world and of our own lives. Amen

Exodus 34:29-35

While Moses was on Mount Sinai the first time, the people of Israel, under Aaron’s leadership, made a golden image of a calf as a symbol of God. So irate was Moses when he discovered the revelry around the Calf that he smashed the stone tablets on which the Ten Commandments were written . God was angry that the people had broken the commandment against casting idols of the deity, but in time has forgiven them; he has invited Moses to ascend the mountain again to receive a replacement set of tablets. While there, he has conversed with God. Vv. 10-26 are the “covenant” (agreement) God has made with the Israelites. In exchange for


  • being their god ;
  • acting among them so that the indigenous peoples of the land will recognize Israel’s uniqueness; and
  • giving them victory over these peoples
  • the Israelites must, as well as obeying the Ten Commandments:

  • not enter into any pact with these peoples
  • destroy their religious symbols
  • not worship with them
  • not intermarry;
  • dedicate their first-born to him
  • keep the feasts of Passover (Weeks, Shavuot, ) and “ingathering” (Tabernacles, Sukkot);
  • observe the Sabbath
  • make pilgrimages three times a year, and
  • offer the first of the harvest to God
  • Now Moses descends the mountain again. His face is radiant: an expression of his privileged place as servant close to God: he reflects God’s glory. Perhaps “returned”s an echo of the Golden Calf incident. Moses dons a “veil” to avoid overwhelming his hearers with God’s reflected glory. Again Moses speaks with God. One account says that “the LORD used to speak to Moses face to face” but another (from a different source) says that God only allowed Moses to see his back ). A final point: the word translated “shining” karan, can be written out as keren, meaning horn. Thus Jerome translated it, and so Michelangelo sculpted Moses with horns (seebelow)!






















    Reflections


    • Moses has been on the mountain receiving the ten commandments. His face is shining because of talking with God. I picture someone who is glowing with being newly in love, or the glow of a woman who is pregnant, or the glow of a parent proud of her or his child...
    • "Mountaintop experiences" - a phrase we often use to describe those experiences where we feel close to God. We describe it as 'mountaintop' because we always know we can't stay up there - we always come walking, running, stumbling, trudging, or crashing back to earth again. What's your mountaintop experience(s)?
    • Diminishing Returns - the example of eating too much ice-cream. The first cone is great, and you want another. The second is good too - you're almost full. By the end of the third though, you're getting diminishing returns. The cone is good, but you are starting to feel sick. You ate too much, and now the joy of the first cone has decreased because you're stuffed. Can God-experiences have diminishing returns? Why would it be bad to be on the mountaintop with God all the time?
    • Chris Haslam writes that Moses' face being "radiant" meant that God's glory was reflected in Moses' face. I really like that description. If we are made in God's image, then can we reflect God in our whole being.
    • Have you ever met someone who radiates the peace or love of God...?

    2 Corinthians 3:12-4:2


    2 Corinthians is a letter, written in the style common in the first century AD. From the text, we know that Paul wrote it in Macedonia after leaving Ephesus, probably in the autumn of 57 AD. It gives us a picture of Paul the person: an affectionate man, hurt by misunderstandings and the wrongs of his beloved fellow Christians, yet happy when he can praise them. The letter's prime intent is to combat errors which have arisen in the Christian communities in the Achaian peninsula of Greece.

    Paul contrasts his ministry with that of Moses. In 3:3, he says that his readers, supported and enabled by the Holy Spirit, are “a letter of Christ”, prepared by him and his colleagues: a letter written on “tablets of human hearts”, not on “tablets of stone”. This is the “confidence that we have through Christ”

    (3:4). The dead letter of the Law has been replaced by the living letter of the Spirit. Moses wore a veil lest the radiance of God’s glory, shown in his face, be too much for his hearers. The new covenant in Christ sets aside the old. The thinking of Israelites was frozen in time (“hardened”, 3:14), and it still is: when they hear the Law read (“old covenant”, 3:14; “Moses”, 3:15), they only see God’s plan for saving people dimly, i.e. through a “veil”, but when one is converted (“turns to the Lord”, 3:16), one sees the plan clearly. In Judaism and Christianity, the motive force is the spirit, but for us Christ and the Holy Spirit are one (“the Lord is the Spirit”, 3:17), and in Christ we have “freedom” from the Law: as we become more and more Christ-like, we are more and more able to render to God the honour (“glory”, 3:18) he is due, with the Spirit’s help. In 10:9-11, Paul’s accusers claim that he is strong on words but weak on action. He now retorts: “by God’s mercy” (4:1) he has turned from persecuting Christians to “this ministry” which he does with “great boldness” (3:12), not losing heart. Unlike his accusers, he has cast aside his horrible hidden deeds of the past, namely unscrupulous acts and misrepresentations of the gospel (4:2). He speaks openly, appealing to all to authentically discern the truth.




    Reflections

    • Paul tells us that in Christ, the veil is set aside between us and God. Christ brings us right up to God, face to face. The ancient Celts spoke of thin places, places where the spiritual realm and the mundane world are very close. Where are your thin places? Where do you get a sense of something behind the veil...?
    • Paul uses reflection/mirror imagery. We are being transformed more and more into God's image, reflecting God's glory in us, since we, "with unveiled faces" can see and experience God's glory. Where do you see God's image reflected?Have you changed over the years as you walk the way with God? Where do you better reflect the image of God?
    • Paul plays with the veiled/unveiled imagery - in Chapter 4:2, Paul talks about renouncing the things that "one hides" - we uncover the truth, uncover our sinful selves, and move on in Christ's forgiveness when we remove, with Christ, the veil that keeps us from God. Reflect on that image, of Christ pulling back the veila

    Luke 9:28-36,(37-43a)
    Jesus has predicted his suffering, death and resurrection to his disciples; he has called on them to “take up their cross” (v. 23), has warned that those who hear the gospel but fail to trust in it will be condemned, and has promised that some present will see the kingdom of God. Now he and the inner circle of disciples ascend “the mountain” (v. 28). In Luke, Jesus always prays before an important event. An aura of unnatural brightness is linked with mystical appearances in Exodus and Acts; “dazzling white” (v. 29) is a symbol of transcendence. In Jewish tradition, both “Moses and Elijah” (v. 30) were taken into heaven without dying. Jesus’ agenda is in accord with the Law and the prophets; he is doing God’s will. “Two men” also appear at the resurrection and at the ascension. Jesus’ “departure” (v. 31, exodos in Greek) is his journey to Jerusalem and his passage from this world. Peter clearly doesn’t understand; perhaps he thinks he is witnessing a super Feast of Tabernacles (“dwellings”, v. 33) – a time when the whole city was brightly illuminated. The “cloud” (v. 34) is a symbol of God’s presence; the words from it recall Jesus’ baptism, and add “listen to him!” (v. 35). Vv. 37-43a, the healing of an epileptic child, present three contrasts: from the mountain to the needy world; Jesus’ great power over evil (vs. the disciples’); and Jesus’ fidelity to God vs. general human infidelity. The child is in miserable condition. In healing him, Jesus shows God’s “greatness” to “all” (v. 43).

    Reflections
    • "The appearance of his face changed." Obviously, this passage ties neatly with our Exodus reading. How are we changed after experiencing the presence of God?Is it significant that it is the face in both passages that is described as changing? The face is the window, perhaps, into our soul - the place on our selves where one can read what is really going on.
    • Peter wants to prolong this joyful, awesome experience. Who can blame him? Things change so quickly in our world, and we face so many struggles, that we really want to hang on when things are clicking into place. Is there a time, moment or season that you would have liked to extend indefinitely?
    • Likewise, Peter and Jesus and company couldn't get to the joy of Easter if they wouldn't leave this Holy Retreat. What if Jesus decided to stay up on the mountain?
    • From the mountaintop Jesus goes down to teach and heal. Is this the pattern for Christian life? Spending time with God and then going out to help others?
    • The disciples' response to what they see is fear. Has an experience of God and who God is ever caused a response of fear in you? We often fear what our relationship with God might require of us. Seeing God and God's glory face to face in such an undeniable way would leave us with an undeniable responsibility to act, wouldn't it?